is now ![]() |
|||||||||||||||
The ORIGINAL Charlotte Fence Company stands by its name and THREE YEARS reputation and therefore has sued Todd Forrest of Forrest Fence Company. A copy of the lawsuit reads below but we abandoned the lawsuit because of the cost. Forrest Fence Company began advertising themselves on websites including Google Maps as Charlotte Fence Company to try to steal people who REFER the company we established. Todd Forrest's bad, desperate, and unethical business tactics are not unheard of, many companies have started resorting to shady business methods as the U.S. economy continues to struggle. Another person did the same and is another example of this economic desperation, trying to use our name to get REFERRAL work. Sorry Todd, that's the TRUTH. |
|||||||||||||||
WE WILL BEAT ANY "CHARLOTTE FENCE COMPANY" OR FORREST FENCE COMPANY" PRICES BY $200 or more. Our old phone number was 704-200-6256 If you are calling 704-200-6256 the new phone number is 704-726-8674. Thank you. |
The irony of this case, was that we contacted Todd Forrest and offered to give him all of our wrought iron, aluminum, and chain link fence jobs if he would just stop stealing the name and website name. I guess he really believed that Google would rank him higher like Ken Plain of Raleigh Fence Company. Where is he at these days?
The lawsuit initally was returned to sender, Todd Forrest decided to refuse our certified letter, then the mailman or a mail person at the Stanley County office must have kept our $15 and thrown away the paperwork, and so the lawsuit was never filed initially, it has since been sent back in with a check for the $15, but we ultimately filed a motion for dismissal because we would rather find a new company name than waste money trying to keep a company name that is generic at best. However, we still feel like what they did by trying to steal a business name that was already established and so someone stole our business name and our $15. Tough life. State of North Carolina In The General Court of Justice
COMPLAINT
Defendant is a resident of Albemarle, Stanly County, North Carolina and is continuing financial harm to Plaintiff. Plaintiff needs an immediate injunction against the Defendant. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to NC Gen. Stat. §7A-240 and NC Gen. Statute §7A-243. The Courts of the State of North Carolina are authorized to exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendant pursuant to NC Gen. Stat. §1-75.4. STATEMENT FOR CLAIM OF RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that the Court:
This _29_ day of December, 2010 State of North Carolina In The General Court of Justice
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
NOW COME Plaintiff, William Harrison, pursuant to NCGS §1-485, and hereby moves the Court to issue a Preliminary Injunction enjoining the Defendant from using the words Charlotte Fence Company and from otherwise engaging in conduct that results in harming William Harrison. In support of this Motion, William Harrison has filed a Verified Complaint which seeks damages for unfair and deceptive trade practices. If Defendant is not enjoined from falsely representing his company, this action will cause immediate and irreparable injury, loss and damage to Plaintiff as set forth in the Verified Complaint. The Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded, and this relief consists of restraining the commission or continuance of Defendants actions, continuance of which, during litigation, would produce injury to the Plaintiff. This _27_ day of January, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Another attempt was by charlottefencecompany.org, the shady business tactics by another competitor and another example of how not to do business. This screenshot below of former website charlottefencecompany.org clearly shows that they were using the name "Charlotte Fence Company" in a manner that would imply that we somehow sponsored or supported Backyard Fence and Specialties. Charlotte Fence Company in capital letters followed with the word presents, gives no other possible explanation of good business tactics. These sleezy, desperate, and misleading tactics are frowned upon by any REPUTABLE marketing company or business. THIS OTHER EXAMPLE HAS SINCE BEEN RESOLVED WITH THE OWNER.
This is why you have the Sheriff serve the Defendant the lawsuit. Todd Forrest was served on February 1, 2011.
State of North Carolina In The General Court of Justice
BACKGROUND
The nature of this action is a result of Defendant’s actions on the Internet allegedly using Plaintiff’s common law trademarks in a manner likely to confuse potential customers. MOTION This __ day of March, 2011
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This the __ day of March, 2011.
State of North Carolina In The General Court of Justice
Order This __ day of March, 2011
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This the __ day of March, 2011.
Todd Forrest then filed a small claims lawsuit against me in Raleigh, which was dismissed and not appealed, and therefore cannot be brought before any court again. Forrest Fence Company is still squatting the name. We had a BETTER VISION, if you get our drift.
|
||||||||||||||